So first off...why is it so damn hard for men and woman to communicate?!?! *end vent*

Now for the question...Guys what can make communication easier from your perspective?
posted by:
  • Re: Communication man to woman...

    Wed, May 14, 2008 - 2:09 PM
    listening. on both ends. listen to what's being said without applying filters to it.
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Wed, May 14, 2008 - 2:31 PM
      I totally agree with Red here. I really wish Listening were taught in Highschool as a required course.

      JSIn
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Wed, May 14, 2008 - 3:09 PM
        and if you feel any inkling at all that your communication was misunderstood - ASK! This has been the hangup in my world. I get a feeling from their response that what I said was 'colored' one way or another and if I don't clarify, it all goes to shit.

        I'd rather hash through a misunderstanding the moment it happens than have it thrown back in my face at a later date, or have it haunt me until I blow up...

        listen, answer honestly, clarify, listen some more
        • Re: Communication man to woman...

          Wed, May 14, 2008 - 3:25 PM
          I think part of it comes from the disconnect between what men want, and what they think women want. Many guys will fib, obfuscate, or evade if they think that an honest answer will get them into trouble or decrease their chances of having sex or spending time with a woman they're interested in.
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Wed, May 14, 2008 - 7:45 PM
      "listening. on both ends. listen to what's being said without applying filters to it."

      Once again PapaRed cinches it. Easier said than done (like everything else in life).
  • Re: Communication man to woman...

    Wed, May 14, 2008 - 6:13 PM
    Culture. That's all I can think it is 'cause I was primarily raised by a single father and I rarely have trouble communicating with men but often find other women to be a complete mystery! I was raised to communicate more logically than emotionally, and while I'm learning emotional communication it still doesn't come to me naturally. I truly believe that our culture raises man and women to communicate differently and we end up shooting ourselves in the collective foot because of it.
    How to help? Men should realize that there is often an unspoken "I feel like" in front of women's statements. Women should realize there's often an unspoken "I think" in front of men's statements. We should both try to actually SAY these things instead of leaving them unspoken so it's easier to tell when we are discussion emotion, when we are discussing opinions and theories, and when we are communicating something we have actually applied some extended thought to.
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Wed, May 14, 2008 - 8:06 PM
      Myriad, I may be more in your camp at times. My husband likes to talk (seemingly insignificant) things to *death*, whereas I often am thinking along the lines of, "How the fuck are we still *TALKING* about this?!?!?" Serves me right for marrying a sensitive Social Worker, I guess. My motto, at home, is Less Talk, More Action - luckily, he doesn't get pissed about that. ;o) I've had some girlfriends that would have been SO upset if I said anything like that to them.

      Taking what dear Jin says into consideration, I have to say that it really upsets me when I can tell that my partner has tuned what I'm saying out. I'm not inclined to say much about myself or my needs/thoughts, unless it's about something that's very important to me, so I get pretty cranky when I have to repeat myself because *someone* has spaced out and is thinking about, say, Buffy or Lego's or something. >:o( Really *listening* to your partner is HUGE - and hard!!!! Ohmigracious - I would be a much better partner (and co-worker, frankly) if I were psychic!!!
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Sat, May 17, 2008 - 9:18 AM
      Myriad is exactly right. It's not a matter of one person's style being more valid than anothers, it is simply how each sex is taught to communicate. Studies have shown this to be the case.

      Where men talk to essentially report information, women talk to establish connections. The solution is not for one sex to cowtow to theother and defer, the solution is for both sexes to put the communication of the other into the context of their communication style.

      I don't know how successful or noble it is to tell a woman how to change in order to address the issues.... there are way too many books and relationsship gurus that take the stand that it is the woman who need sto change and that's it. Both people are responsible for how they get along, not just one.
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Sat, May 17, 2008 - 10:04 AM
        I think a component of it is to identify what sort of information is being transfered. If a man is l;ooking to deepen connections and move forward toward a deeper level of intimacy then a more female mode of communication would be called for. In my view at least then the general male model would need to be modified to accomplish that.

        If one is dealing with a problem or information that is critical to the mechanics of how something is going to work the male model is more appropriate.


        Certainly one style is not better than another they are simply different.

        JSin
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Tue, May 27, 2008 - 4:04 PM
      Myriad, i have actually made a SPECIFIC habit of including EXACTLY those words to everything i say, whether to a woman or to a man, and i dunno, doesnt seem to make a big diference, i think that if youre not a good listener it all goes to shit either way, i myself have had a hard time listening, if im being emotional in ANY way i can count on endless miscommunications on both sides, and it turns out to just be a big mishmash with neither party getting their idea across clealy. I really think communication requires BOTH parties to be sane, calm and have a basic understanding of where the other is coming from, otherwise its doomed from the start, one of the reasons i try to just avoid communication in RL in the first plae, saves on the headaches, but i DO try to listen clearly at least, just dont often open my trap to add to the conversation most of the time. at elast TPYING is more or less clear, but even then people filter everything they hear through their cultural, and emotional filters, sometimes resulting in miscommunication even with the written word.
      peronally, i think we should all just go back to grunting our needs to one another, at least that way a miscommunicatrion is expercted and i wont be so dissapointed, lol.
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Wed, May 28, 2008 - 3:05 PM
        Hmm, it has made a difference to me. Saying "I think.." instead of just laying out whatever my hypothesis is does seem to lower the number of times people get offended by what I say. Saying "I feel..." also tends to clue some of my less emotionally in tune friends into the fact that I'm just discussing feelings at the moment and not facts or even hypotheses. But, yes, if folks just aren't listening to you there isn't much you can do. They won't hear.
        I would also like to draw a distinction between emotional communication and being emotional, as I see them as differently. Emotional communication, for me, involves communication from the perspective of how we are feeling. It doesn't mean acting out how we are feeling. When I am communicating logically I disregard my emotional attachments to issues and think of consequences and capabilities. When I am communicating emotionally I let people know how actions will make me feel and how I am feeling in this moment. When I get emotional then I start communicating erratically and irrationally, sometimes accusatively, with the end result of not effectively communication what I think OR what I feel.

        Really the biggest help to me has simply been realizing that other people don't necessarily mean what I would mean were I saying what they are saying. People communicate differently, and it goes way beyond just male or female, emotional or logical, calm or agitated. There are scads of different communication styles. The biggest challenge then, for me, is recognizing what a person's style and learning to communicate with them in a way that they will hear what I MEAN and use words in a way that they will interpret them correctly.
  • Re: Communication man to woman...

    Thu, May 15, 2008 - 8:50 AM
    My advice to women for 'getting men to communicate better':

    1) Answer the question asked.

    2) Ask the question you want answered.
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Thu, May 15, 2008 - 5:50 PM
      add to what Orangeboxman said

      3) follow the KiS strategy - Keep it Simple :)
      and don't give me too many choices (Have you noticed that my all my shirts are blue or blue?)
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Thu, May 15, 2008 - 8:36 PM
        O.K., now - I was being somewhat facetious regarding my husband, but the core truth is that it truly is an *amazing* gift to speak your heart's truth to your partner, and to really be *heard*, and how wonderful it is to give them the same gift in return! No judgments, no filters; just being present for them is a big deal.

        I'm also smart enough to know that if I don't spell something out for my lover, I sure as hell can't expect them to just figure it out on my own. To expect otherwise would be both cruel and crazy-making. If you need or want something; if something is dead-important to you; fucking *TELL* me - don't expect me to just miraculously discover it on my own. Again, not psychic, shouldn't be expected to be. :o)
        • Re: Communication man to woman...

          Fri, May 16, 2008 - 6:24 AM
          "If you need or want something; if something is dead-important to you; fucking *TELL* me - don't expect me to just miraculously discover it on my own."

          I find myself fortunate to be partnered with someone who practices this "miracle method" of communication, and more importantly forgives me when i forget to return the courtesy. ;-) After several years of living together we can communicate more with fewer words, though on occasion we both have to remind the other to be more explicit, particularly for the important stuff.
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Fri, May 16, 2008 - 7:47 AM
        >3) follow the KiS strategy - Keep it Simple :)

        I think that would inevitably result from proper application of #1 and #2, unless the real question, itself, is not a simple question.

        To be fair, though, the real question is almost always simpler than the one asked or answered.

        That's a large part of the problem I meant to address.
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Thu, May 15, 2008 - 8:35 PM
      AKA, Answer the question as it is asked *not as how you would like to rephrase it to put YOUR point in*, and

      #2 is spot on. It's complete arrogance to expect ANYONE to respond verbally to your body language/tonallity cues. Expect them to respond with body language/tonality, if you want to get wrapped up in the packing of the gift (the presentation of the message).

      That's all. You want drama, we want what's there :).

      ~ Kole
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Fri, May 16, 2008 - 6:31 AM
        "#2 is spot on. It's complete arrogance to expect ANYONE to respond verbally to your body language/tonallity cues. Expect them to respond with body language/tonality, if you want to get wrapped up in the packing of the gift (the presentation of the message)."

        Seriously. I've dated two "psychics" and they just couldn't comprehend that body language DOESN'T translate into a detailed list of their issues in iambic pentameter and full color illustrations. If I start to see major body language that;s out of sync with the message, particular a curt one, I refer back to question #2. Yeah, some questions are scary or just obvious to you, but if it's that important please be willing to be direct about it.
        • Re: Communication man to woman...

          Fri, May 16, 2008 - 7:42 AM
          J wrote:
          >"Seriously. I've dated two "psychics" and they just couldn't comprehend that body language DOESN'T translate into a detailed list of their issues in iambic pentameter and full color illustrations."<

          Yeah I have dated more than a couple of those. I have found the best solution is to first explain that I don't read body language and thoughts. Second time I completely ignore anything but the spoken words as spoken. Third time I demonstrate clear and precise communication:
          "We are done, I am not going to be held responsible for your lack of ability to say what you mean."

          To me when I am held responsible for what I am supposed to have understood she ment it make me paranoid. Not a state I find myself comfortable in. Far better to just be alone.

          JSin
  • Re: Communication man to woman...

    Fri, May 16, 2008 - 2:02 PM
    I like getting the full picture. There is nothing more maddening to me than getting parts of a story fogged over when being told to me.

    I had one woman tell me a story about her friend and kept referring to a part of the story that she didn't feel comfortable telling me about as the "wa wa wa".

    Her: So we were talking about the "wa wa wa" at she said that she couldn't help the "wa wa wa" and she was going to do the "wa wa wa" no matter what happened.

    Me: WTF is a "wa wa wa"???

    No wonder it didn't last between us. Don't bother telling me half stories or leaving things out because you don't think I can handle them. I'm a big boy, and I deserve and demand the full truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
    • Re: Communication man to woman...

      Fri, May 16, 2008 - 2:55 PM
      Is that kinda like the shortcut of "It just happened" when someone tells of a sexual story that you know DAMN WELL occurred because she decided she was gonna fuck the guy 2 minutes after she met him.

      "Oh my goodness... I mean it just happened... all of our clothes fell off then the earth shifted.... quite suddenlike.... and he fell on me repeatedly forcing his huge throbbing cock into me"... um wa wa wa yadda yadda yadda

      JSin
      • Re: Communication man to woman...

        Fri, May 16, 2008 - 3:42 PM
        Many good points, but one significant point missing, as the guys seem to be trying to coddle a bit on this thread and be liked.
        Get to the point. Stop beating around the bush. Stop making a story that lasts 45 seconds into a 10 minute storyline because you feel uncomfortable.
        Where it comes to logical vs. emotional this is a big problem.
        Many women like to be the center of attention for as long as they can hold the man into the conversation.
        This can get really annoying over time.
        Yes, there are moments that require longer, deeper conversation, but not EVERY conversation has to be that way.
        I'm fortunate that I am married to a woman that is tomboy at heart, but not in looks.
        She does have her moments where I say to 'stop beating around the bush', but usually she gets to it.
        Many men didn't get raised on romance novels or fairytales or get caught up in the chick flicks, so we tend to 'check out', think on other things, etc. when a woman goes into a storyline and then we try to grasp the main points in between.
        Sometimes we don't and get chewed on for 'not paying attention', but honestly...... *though your guy might tell you different so you don't kick his ass with deprivation*.....it seems worth it.
        Think of it like this; How many movies are really good of all the one's released in a year?
        If you equate that to a long story to listen to, on a regular basis, how many times is a guy going to hear everything said?
        We learn to skip through the emotional/ romance story part, until the logic finally appears in the conversation and then have to snap out of our daydream.
        There's 3 types of guys that would disagree with this
        1. The gay guy, who thinks more like a female than a male.
        2. The guy who will white lie it, so you don't kick his ass for agreeing that this makes perfect sense, as it is easier to give a silent Hoorah, then deal with all the turmoil that my post could create in a battle of the sexes at home.
        3. The guy who wants to get in your pants, acts like they are 'sensitive' or 'spiritual' and makes your guy appear to be insensitive with little remarks here and little remarks there. This is the worst of the lot and here is a great example of what they will do(As long as it stays up)
        people.tribe.net/052c0265-...7acc498093
        people.tribe.net/052c0265-...178f9736ef
        The spiritual ones do the fake 'shaman' thing, but they all have the goal....get in your pants, no matter what it takes and who it hurts.

        I am a man. I love most things about women. I just tire of sitting through a story that can be summarized quickly and then we can go back to hanging out and having fun or holding my woman when she has finished the story or quick summary and needs some T.L.C..
        She gives that to me, why shouldn't I give it back?
        Some would say that is part of why I should sit through all the storylines, but I disagree.
        She knows I love her, she knows I will listen to her go on about the same thing time and again, where I would have resolved the problem before time number 3. I love what she says when she talks of her thoughts, emotions, spirituality. I just don't care much for stories that are used to stall off getting to the point that one is afraid to get to.
        How have the stories gone down to a minimum?
        I accept her on things that she thinks would have people ready to run out the door screaming.
        Do we fight? Yeah, not that often as a whole, but when money is tight and change is occurring; life happens and part of life is a fight here and there.
        Will I ever figure out the whole and complexities of a woman?
        No, just like everyone else.
        Sometimes I think on those complexities, but to do so all the time would drive a man insane.
        Betcha.....
        ......I have much more to say on this, but, lol, I tire of telling stories or parables at the moment. ;-)
        • Re: Communication man to woman...

          Thu, May 22, 2008 - 8:22 PM
          wow your one dimensional opinion of women who "go on and on" is incredibly recoiling. esp from someone who effectively made the same point over and over again. you think women talk too much. we get it.
          • Re: Communication man to woman...

            Thu, May 22, 2008 - 8:43 PM
            Яt b...
            No, what was "one dimensional" was your reading. I love my wife, I love talking to women. When it comes down to a serious talk; I want people to get to the point, both men and women. there is a time for stories and romance talk where things are described like a story, but dancing around an uncomfortable topic benefits no one.
            You say to tell it like it is in your blog and say you respect that, but.... when you hear a person telling it like it is; you can't handle it.
            I guess it only pertains to certain situations; those where it is a topic that you agree with.
            By the way, I do agree with that blog. i just think you are stating the words like they are your full principle, but when faced with truth from a guy, about how he thinks and knows from many conversations with other guys about their bitches about the topic, you either deny it or can't handle it. Yes, there will be people that fit the mold differently, but from all walks of life of guys that I have encountered or overheard...this is their #1 bitch about females. Also, the relationship destroyer if they mention it to the wrong female who bases their whole importance on being the center of attention in a conversation by telling her stories.
            Betcha
            • Re: Communication man to woman...

              Thu, May 22, 2008 - 9:19 PM
              so a woman's way of telling her stories is less important because you don't get it/don't have the same conversation style?
              blechhh.
              • Re: Communication man to woman...

                Fri, May 23, 2008 - 3:58 PM
                Free,
                That's cool and your opinion.
                You do know that by saying what you said, you said the exact same thing from the woman perspective that I was referring to.
                I said I want it a certain way and you said the same thing, with the"blech" tagger.
                It's all good, not offended, am happily married and have never had a problem finding a woman or her finding me in the past.
                The reason I say that?
                The blech was an implied "turn off" statement. I can respect your opinion and still say that I don't care if I turn a person off, as it doesn't make a difference in my life. I'm not questing for any, nor would I seek a person who goes on and on with story lines as I described up above, as in...just to get more attention or because a person is sidestepping being real, until they have to. To me, it implies a person who makes up stories and will easily lie over time. I don't value that quality in another. This doesn't imply anything about you, Free, I am just furthering the original statements I made.
                Betcha
                • Re: Communication man to woman...

                  Fri, May 23, 2008 - 7:40 PM
                  yes, cool, and you're entitled to your opinion also. i *personally* felt that you were stereotyping, and that as a response to inspiring better communication between men and women, it didn't go much further than insulting anyone who *you* personally felt didn't speak in a linear, a-z fashion. i've stayed away from this thread, because from the beginning it felt like the direction was "women should x...y...z...in order to have better communication with men" and not vice-versa, and i just didn't feel like getting into it. your answer took the cake and was the final turnoff. i enjoy non-linear conversations with some men of my acquaintance, they are few and far between and i *love* them for not insulting my intelligence, and really, it was just a statement of discontent with this entire thread.
            • Re: Communication man to woman...

              Thu, May 22, 2008 - 10:15 PM
              Very well-said, and excellent points.

              Regarding the two posts you mentioned, those are just more subtle ways of getting what you want. They're effective, but if the person in question has any moral compass or semblance of a spine, they'll refrain from trying to 'diss' other men if they're trying to get in a gal's pants.

              ~ Kole